Sylvia

Racist Britain

Racism in UK
by Sylvia 3 years ago (Mon, Nov 28, 2011) in Fail (SFW)
Good | Poor | +52 -7 88%
Favorite (17) | Flag | Share: Embed | Email | Facebook
x

Select size: Custom: Width: px Height: px
254 comments | Sorted by top | 254 new comments added since your last visit to this upload ( marked in pink background ). You must be logged in for this feature to work
  • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +22 -1
    living in a free society means you have to tolerate people who express opinions you don't share.....your right to express yourself allows you to use words only...when you lay a hand on someone you've breached their freedom.... until she does that, you'll have to suck it up...... she probably doesn't like your opinion either but you're allowed to express it... free speech for all and fuck the pc police and the thought police.. say it loud, even if you're ignorant and proud
    • DrunkEnough | 3 years ago | +3 -1
      Most Brits share her opinion. No guns, no freedom expression, no playing, no running, no fun!
      • minear | 3 years ago | +2 -1
        They have the most CCTV, gun control, and they are arresting people for free speech. yah its fucking 1984!
    • psyclops | 3 years ago | +1
      you want freedom... legalize all actions not just words... lets see what equilibrium true freedom brings compared to the bullshit we have in our so called "free" nations.. then we would see what kind of rights our freedom mongers would vie for.
    • Winterborn82 | 3 years ago
      correct me if im wrong, but i didnt think that freedom of speech was a right in Britain.
      • bigblackjake | 3 years ago
        perhaps i'm mistaken......maybe it's not a right in the u.k.; which would partially explain why there are so many angry young men
        • TallyHo | 3 years ago | +4
          No it very much is but we have laws against racism and public order offences, you can say what you like as long as it isn't without malice or directed with the purpose to cause harrasment, alarm or distress which is fair enough! Young men in England are reacting to a more right wing approach (angry) because of economic problems which are blamed on previous governments left wing approaches, a knee jerk reaction is to blame the immigration increase caused by the same left wing government. This isn't just happening in the UK but all over Europe.... Just like it did in the 1930's! and we all know what happened there!
          • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +3
            c'mon tally, it's not really free speech when it can be routed based on perceived intent...and blaming left wing dogma for current economic problems is part of the propaganda that goes along with the 1% skimming all of the cream and milk while the 99% get to fight for the curds and whey...politics as usual...organized money is the problem, not progressive ideology...
            • TallyHo | 3 years ago | +1
              Free speach is exactly what it says on the tin and is encouraged, what that woman showed was a form of verbal assault intended to offend. If it was a heathy debate on race (which is often shown on British TV with representatives from each minority) then we wouldnt be discussing this. The UK invented "liberty and freedom" and continues to be one of the most forward thinking countries in the world. The "police state" tag it has received lately is only due to the demands imposed on the police of having to protect the quiet majority. I agree with your summary on the blame towards left wing governments... But people are people and like a good old fashioned witch hunt so they can blame someone! I do however feel that British media is fueling it which has given rise to the general right wing ethos, even the term uk police state was formed by British media to make us turn against government. Don't get me wrong this isnt just the uk but as we were once the "great empire" people love to see us fall!
              • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
                forgive me for pointing this out, but the u.k. did NOT "invent liberty and freedom"... and where the fuck does anyone get off deciding free speech can be curtailed depending on someone's interpretation of "intent" or if the speaker is intending to be abusive.. if i tell you to "fuck off you stupid cunt" i'm intentionally being abusive and i'm assaulting you with words.. you're free to respond with words and any law that tries to intervene has overstepped it's purpose
                • TallyHo | 3 years ago | +1
                  The uk did invent modern democracy, therefore liberty and freedom.. It's called history, check it out (we made most of it!). I also have to disagree that the law is there to "get off on" it's there to protect the people who can't defend themselfs
                  • TallyHo | 3 years ago | +3
                    If someone told me to "fuck off you stupid cunt" I either deserve it or laugh off the fact the person is wrong.. I don't rise to their Neanderthal stupidity and endulge in similar "word exchanges". However if I was told "fuck you All white men are ignorant smelly arseholes" then I can't defend something that I physically am, this is a verbal assault known as racism - not freedom of speach! I'm afraid you got freedom of speach mixed up with being able to say anything without consequences which is very different. Saying anything withought thought or consequence leads to arguments, fights and wars! The only hope for humanity is if we all clime out of the cave and realise everything we do and say has consequences ... Laws teach the stupid and ignorant
                    • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
                      if you're incapable of defending yourself with words, you will either retreat or resort to violence.. that's your weakness, not mine
                    • CaptainFlyscratch | 3 years ago | +1 -1
                      saying a group of people is all "this or that" is not abuse or assault, it is a misguided opinion and should not be criminalized. Making a threat should not be either. Holding a weapon or raising one's fists AND making the same threat should be classed as assault and be criminalized.
                      • TallyHo | 3 years ago | +2
                        I agree in most cases you are right, but one thing to mention is that if you are arrested under section 5 of the public order act it will probably be dropped or treated as a non recordable offence.. 90% of the time it's just used to get the person away as to not cause a fight. 99.9% of the time your in and out of custody in 5 mins! The police stop a fight, everyone shuts up and no one gets a record! Only in extreme cases will you get a fine or worse, this woman will get a fine due to the publicity it has received.
                        • SomeOleBullshit | 2 years ago | +2
                          I know this is an old post, but the cops arresting someone to stop the incident, let everyone cool down and then letting everybody get on with their lives sounds like a damn good thing.
                  • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
                    um, yeah, if you want to check history regarding "democracy" you might want to check out the early greek civilization and a fellow named "democritus".. it's called history, check it out sometime..
                    • jodaniels | 3 years ago | +3 -1
                      He said modern democracy. You're losing it, man.
                      • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1 -1
                        define "modern".. does that mean pre-columbian? if so, my mistake, but make your statements a little more clear for those of us that don't operate under the same assumptions.
                        • TallyHo | 3 years ago | +1
                          The "modern Era" is collectively known as the period after the middle or dark ages so around 1500... So not quite 2000bc
                        • jodaniels | 3 years ago | +1
                          It's called parliamentary democracy and it was the Brits who used it first.
                          • deleted | 3 years ago | +1
                            The UK has a Constitutional monarchy as its form of government.
                            • TallyHo | 3 years ago | +1
                              In 1215 the magna carta was signed which transfered power from the monarchy to the government and they now have no powers.. 1215 so only a few years wrong?
                    • TallyHo | 3 years ago | +1
                      And you might want to check out where I put modern democracy...
                      • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
                        histrionics aside, it's free speech or it isn't..there's no middle.. if there are exceptions, it's not really free, is it
                        • TallyHo | 3 years ago | +1
                          In very bare bones your right but the world would be a much worse place if we were all allowed to rant ill informed hateful words if if didn't have any consequences.. Believe me I have to deal with this everyday! I'd much rather be thinking of boobs!
                          • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
                            i'm not advocating rude behaviour but there are certain inconveniences that come with living in a free society. you have to tolerate people from other races and sexual orientations.. i'm an egalitarian and i believe in live and let live... but i don't want or need a nanny state to dictate what is polite conversation. fuck that; and fuck anyone who thinks they should be able to control anyone else's freedom to express their feelings, no matter how juvenile those feelings may be.
                            • TallyHo | 3 years ago | +1
                              Yes but laws are only brought in for very extreme cases, as mentioned earlier it is very rare to get fined or more and it's used as a prevention before it escalates to a physical assaults. So generally less people get Hurt and less people get insulted while decreasing the amount of assaults... Win win win? The only drawback is people can't be aggressively racist towards people which isn't a bad thing?
                              • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1 -1
                                can't decide whether to scoff or sigh.. but okay ...tomato totahto ..... theory and practice.. it only takes one bad actor to fuck shit up for everyone... we're mostly in agreement.. there's a fine line between sensible civil law and nanny state doctrine/dogma.. it doesn't appear as though either of us is going to completely acquiesce to the other's ideal or ideology..
                                • TallyHo | 3 years ago | +1
                                  Being a person who has to enforce these laws I aught to defend my side otherwise I couldn't sleep at night.... But I happily can
                  • deleted | 3 years ago | +1
                    lol, no you didn't. Although much of our legal system is copied from the British system you can credit ancient Greece and Rome for democratic and republic forms of government.
                    • jodaniels | 3 years ago | +1
                      Th US and UK forms of government are completely different. The US type of goverment was influenced by the French revolution at the time when it was formed.
                      • deleted | 3 years ago | +1
                        jo, the French revolution started a little after the American revolution.
                        • jodaniels | 3 years ago | +1
                          yes and some say that is also inspired the French revolution but later on it (the French system) had an impact on the USA type of government, hence the senate and congress.
                        • jodaniels | 3 years ago | +1
                          They were great alies at that time because they had a common enemy -- The UK. They also and exchanged ideas and philosophies. The US took more from the French than it gave as it was a young nation and it needed help.
              • koolios2050 | 3 years ago | -1
                well put. I find it a bit odd but not surprising that so many people in so many countries misconstrue the meaning of things like "free speech".
            • TallyHo | 3 years ago
              Plused for a spiffing debate
    • Sylvia | 3 years ago | +7 -9
      No you don't. There are laws against this and she was arrested today. Apparently she broke 7 laws. You are NOT allowed to say what you want. Try it and see - phone the FBI and say something about the President - good luck
      • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +3
        well that is fucked up....welcome to the end of freedom when your freedom of speech is taken away.... i feel sorry for anyone that approves of that
        • koolios2050 | 3 years ago | +1 -3
          Considering you are a United States citizen, I am not surprised that you have a distorted view of what "Freedom of Speech" means. It is not the universal right to say whatever you want to whomever you want with absolutely no consequences. It applies to speech regarding government mostly, and several other classes of speech, so that the government cannot punish individuals for voicing dissent, and people cannot be punished for voicing opinions in a rational manner to those who disagree. Verbal assault, communicating a threat, slander, and a few other categories are not covered, and from the looks and sounds of this video, this woman would be in violation of a few of these things here in the U.S. "Freedom" means "freedom of choice" not "freedom from consequences and personal responsibility"
          • deleted | 3 years ago | +1
            Verbal assault is covered under the 1st Amendment.
        • [ -5 Comment by Sylvia was filtered ] Show (36 descendent comments)
        • Sylvia | 3 years ago | -5
          I approve of it - I was witness to the many riots this year. People died as a DIRECT result of riots incited by your 'freedom of speech' The day you are allowed to stand in the street and say "All blacks are scum, beat them all, who is with me?" or similar will be a sad day
          • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
            there is a huge difference between saying you hate someone and actually hitting someone... hitting someone is and should be illegal.. saying what you want should be your right
            • Sylvia | 3 years ago | +2 -5
              So you would be ok with a guy walking up to your 3 year old daughter and saying "I want to fuck you up the ass little girl"? Or a call to your wife saying "I'm going to slit your throat" You would be ok with that?
              • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
                once again, speaking and rioting are two entirely different things..
              • bigblackjake | 3 years ago
                of course not, but i'd have to tell him to back off, not just bash his head in because he's obviously insane and saying insane shit... but i get your point; there are extremes to ideals where things are not so black and white... fight words with words, fight violence against your family or yourself with deadly force
                • stankmaster | 3 years ago | +1
                  If you bash somebodies head in it's a crime. If you tell them you're going to bash their head in, it's also a crime. Assault and battery, look it up. Assault generally involves no physical contact.
                  • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
                    stank, i'm going to bash your head in... have i really just committed a crime? not in the world with which i'm familiar...
                • Sylvia | 3 years ago

                  All they did was exercise their freedom of speech. They're in prison now for it - good riddance to them too

                  Inciting riots 

                  • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
                    when you start jailing people for what they say, where does it end? will you eventually be jailed for saying something bad about bank of america or citicorp? it's a slippery slope and one i'd hate to be near.
                    • deleted | 3 years ago | -1
                      [image]
                  • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
                    so sylvia, if you're complaining about your mother and i laughingly tell you to "just kill the bitch" and you do it....somehow i'm the one who's responsible for your actions? if you believe that, then you do belong in a nanny state where all are considered infants and not responsible for their own behavior..
                    • Sylvia | 3 years ago
                      Of course not - ridiculous. I kill her, Im responsible.
                  • PissFlap | 3 years ago | -2
                    For a pretty Brasilian girl, you sure know a lot about Britain and you're English is better than an Englshman's.
                    • Sylvia | 3 years ago
                      I'm one of the disgusting blacks to which she is referring
                      • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +2
                        sylvia, i like you. you're usually intelligent and articulate; but you're wrong about this.. it's impossible to legislate moral behavior.. it's even impossible to really define what  "moral" behavior is.  of course rioting is a crime. but that's another topic.  the abuses of the death penalty in the u.s. are a crime but the death penalty itself is an excellent deterrent to recidivism. here is another example of where ideas collide simply because they are not clearly defined.
                        • Sylvia | 3 years ago
                          It's not impossible to legislate moral behaviour at all. There is now a good samaritan law for exampe which makes it an obligation for people to interfere if they see an ongoing crime.
                          • cantundonexttime | 3 years ago | +1
                            That is only relevant if you conflact morality with legality, two separate, usually unrelated things.
                          • bigblackjake | 3 years ago
                            if you see a woman being raped by a group of thugs are you going to try to stop them? or will you try to escape so you don't get the same treatment?
                            • bigblackjake | 3 years ago
                              and even if "moral" behaviour can be legislated, it will be pretty hard to enforce
                        • koolios2050 | 3 years ago
                          On this you are incorrect as well. It is very possible to regulate moral behavior. It IS impossible to regulate morals though. For instance, I may not be allowed to refuse government services to a person I hate or for race, gender, sex or age reasons, but I can hate that tranny fag nigger bitch, all I want. And the death penalty is only a deterrent to the extent that the criminal is not going to do ANYTHING else after the sentence is carried out. Oddly enough, in areas that have the "toughest" laws and sentencing, the violent crime rates are actually higher, especially in the United States versus much lower murder and violent crime rates for non death penalty states (except for 1990 in the last 20 years or so ;-)) http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/deterrence-states-without-death-penalty-have-had-consistently-lower-murder-rates http://www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/issues/death-penalty/us-death-penalty-facts/the-death-penalty-and-deterrence http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-about-deterrence-and-death-penalty
                          • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
                            the first part of your reply makes no sense to me. as for the second part; your stats are erroneous and i was only using the death penalty as an example of how ideas get corrupted when people let one argument flow into another.
                      • deleted | 3 years ago | +2 -1
                        Sylvia...your Black.....does Mom Know?
                      • CaptainFlyscratch | 3 years ago
                        I thought you were a Latina? Now you are a negro? Or both? I'm confused...
              • Digglers | 3 years ago
                If that were the case, then I will them my freedom of expression.
              • Hanson666999 | 3 years ago | +3 -6
                Thats gotta be the dumbest argument I have ever read. Talk about sounding melodramatic. Ass fucking a little girl? What the hells wrong with you Sylvia.
                • Sylvia | 3 years ago | +1
                  I'll ask you the same question - is it ok for someone to swear at your kid or threaten your wife? Is it their 'right?'
                  • CaptainFlyscratch | 3 years ago | +3 -1
                    yes, it is alright because they are just words....but I will deal personally on a case by case basis, when someone swears in front of my daughter, but a threat is a threat and can be dealt with through police channels. Having an opinion or bias is not illegal and should never be....making threats that are heard by more than the victim of the abuse should be treated as a crime.
                    • Sylvia | 3 years ago | +1
                      Tell me how you will deal with someone swearing in front of your daughter.
                      • CaptainFlyscratch | 3 years ago | +2
                        I ask them nicely to refrain as there is a young set of ears present, then I wait to hear a reply before I decide whether to physically or verbally hand them a new ass. How else should it be dealt with?
                  • JesusHellscream | 3 years ago | +1
                    Yes and its his right to protect his family I wouldn't mind spending a few days in jail for beating someones ass because idd love to find the jury that would find me guilty for fuckin up a guy that threatened to rape or kill my wife or child and by the way I owe you a neg touch screen plused you when i hit reply oh and btw Brazilians are legally considered white in the us so good luck playing the race card here
                    • Sylvia | 3 years ago
                      Oh legally white in the US? Ok I'll be sure to mention that next time I'm racially abused
                  • turdusmcflurdus | 3 years ago | +1
                    sorry silvia even though i see where you are coming from, someones opinions are not the same as threats.... telling someone you are gonna slit their throat can cause that person considerable distress and is deemed as assault
          • Winterborn82 | 3 years ago
            rioting is not free speech, rioting is a criminal act in almost all countries. you cant make someone riot just by telling them to, its a choice they make as an individual.
      • Winterborn82 | 3 years ago
        In the US you have the right of free speech so long as it doesnt infringe upon anothers rights, i.e. yelling fire in a crowded building if there is no fire, speaking words deemed obscene in front of a minor in public. i dont know if any of these are illegal in england but i would think they are.
        • bigblackjake | 3 years ago
          it's free speech or it isn't..there's no in between.. when you start down the road banning obscenity, then who gets to decide what is obscene? and it's parents duty to teach their children about how to behave in public, it's not the governments job to legislate politeness or make rude speech in front of a child illegal; that's just stupid
          • Winterborn82 | 3 years ago | +1
            most laws regarding verbal obscenity's are on the local level. it often viewed the same as teaching a minor criminal behavior which is also a crime.
            • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
              (sigh) i've lost my country
              • Winterborn82 | 3 years ago | +1
                i'm not disagreeing with your view point, just stating the realities. people shouldnt have such a thin skin that such laws are needed.
                • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
                  well now we're on the same page.. some people really do need a "nanny state"
      • SupremeLegend | 3 years ago | +1 -1
        Wow, Sylvia. You are an idiot. Free speech is free speech. You don't like it? Then piss off. Arresting someone for what they think is oppression, plain and simple.
        • Sylvia | 3 years ago | +1 -1
          Youre wrong If I don't like it, I have many other options. Running away isn't one for me
          • SupremeLegend | 3 years ago | +3
            Neither is arresting someone because you don't like what they say. Thus, you are a fucking idiot.
      • [ -5 Comment by deleted was filtered ] Show (1 descendent comments)
      • deleted | 3 years ago | +1 -6
        you are totally right sylvia, freedom of speech does not include acts to initiate racial tension or racial violence. freedom of speech is a way to attack govermental process etc, not specific abuse because of someones colour.
        • CaptainFlyscratch | 3 years ago | +1
          grow up. Freedom of speech is exactly that...freedom to speak your mind...don't wrap it up in a bullshit PC suit now...
  • dublj08 | 3 years ago | +7
    Niggers come in all colors.
  • g0g3tfuck3d | 3 years ago | +6
    i'd like to see her put that "kid shield" down...and then run off at the mouth like that!
    • Photowolf | 3 years ago | +1
      100% agree! That chick behind her about beat her ass until she saw the kid on her lap...
  • CaptainFlyscratch | 3 years ago | +6 -1
    I find it ironic that this white woman cracks and speaks her mind, yet Islamists can march freely inciting hatred for all those around them, openly and in public, but that is ok....
    is this acceptable?? Why aren't these people arrested for their clearly racist and xenophobic views and actions??
    • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
      i wish the would do that in my neighborhood so i could taunt them with my "fuck allah, the pig fucking pedophile" t-shirt
      • mjmj | 3 years ago | +2
        I was reading ur comments, u been making good points here and there. however, I truly didn't like what u wrote here. I think it was not appropriate. freedom of speech has limitations in my opinion. my mother used to tell me that it is okat to open my arms in a room full of ppl because this is my freedom. but when my arms reach someone's boarders or physically touch him, then I have to stop, because it is no longer my freedom to express my want to open my arms. as I'm forced now to respect others.
        • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
          who says we have to respect others? some people deserve my respect and others don't.. and once again, if it has limitations, it's not really free speech, is it ?
          • mjmj | 3 years ago | +1
            I totally respect ur opinion and thought about sharing mine with u. I still think that ppl should measure the words they say specially in public. I truly don't know why u have this opinion, but I was tought to shut up and never respond when I'm angry.. I was also tought to measure my words and respect myself before others. becuz in fact anything u say can held against u, and ppl could hold this agianst u, ur words tell others how well u were raised. and I'm a woman, everything can damage my image, so I keep myself away from disrespecting and being disrespected . however, I still think u got a good point, but we can't apply our good points (regardless of that we always assume we r right and everyone else is wrong, therefore, everything we say is accurate) in all situations because of its unpleasent consequences (sometimes)
            • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +1
              of course our words have impact, and sometimes hurtful and negative. this is just a topic about which i am as passionate as i am about equality and justice. i made extreme examples to illustrate my point. i'm not a mean person and i don't say mean things...well i've said a few mean things here to insult those who've provoked me with their weak attempts at insults but that is part of the fun here for some of us. i love words and use them to great effect in many areas. while i don't agree with what some people say, i think they should be allowed to say whatever they like. there are ignorant people everywhere but i'm totally against curtailing speech. i may not respect what they say but i respect their right to say it..but i guess i've made that clear enough
      • deleted | 3 years ago | +1 -1
        That would be offensive. Might I recommend wearing something less inflammatory: say, a T-Shirt which reads, "Muhammad Was A Camel-Fucking Faggot!"
  • deleted | 3 years ago | +6 -2
    Here in the U.S. she would have been gang beaten to a bloody pulp. Only blacks are allowed to run their mouths like that because they are incapable of being racist. ;^/
    • bigblackjake | 3 years ago
      you and notime must have lived in some shitty neighorhoods....
      • deleted | 3 years ago | +1
        We had to ride on public school buses in the 70's.
  • deleted | 3 years ago | +5 -1
    Let me clear something up...... this woman is a complete lump of shit, there is no such thing as a "true britain" the area she lives in has been occupied for 2000 years by people from all walks of life. The fact is, we blame others for our own failings, we are unable to blame ourselves so we look for the weak link. Rascism of any form plays no part in this world, no one is perfect and let he who cast the first stone and all that. i bet you anything the black people on that tram work a damn harder than she ever will and are happy to do it for a bottom dollar. i agree britain is a shit hole now, but we have ourselves to blame because its always been a shithole, when were the inner cities ever decent.
    • TallyHo | 3 years ago
      When the huns "refurbished" the place in WW2?
  • ChainsawMascara | 3 years ago | +4
    i can understand she might be angry about people from other countries being there .. i mean some countries like denmark i understand got into trouble for letting to many people in, had to start sending them back. we had some people from another country in mine at one point working since there where no jobs in theirs and my god they where awful cunts. as a girl i was literally chased by them and on several occasions had to run into random houses for safety .. not saying all foreigners are bad, just in some cases they really can be a problem.
  • SticksAndStones | 3 years ago | +3
    Proof that there are stupid people in every country. I don't necessarily disagree with her (or agree) But am more concerned with the kid. Good thing he is at an age where he might not comprehend the lack of proper social behavior. Disgusting minger slag.
  • TheFlavMan | 3 years ago | +5 -2
    I guess the British are the original rednecks aren't they?!?!
    • deleted | 3 years ago | -3
      the british are the fleecers of the world, we have no right to discuss what is good and bad, for fucks sake, we have imprisoned, tortured and murdered more innocent people on this planet for our own greed that anyone. we are a shameful country with a shameful past, we deserve no respect at all.
      • CaptainFlyscratch | 3 years ago | +2
        way to point out only the negatives man.....what about all the good it has done?
  • MrJones | 3 years ago | +9 -6
    Stupid cow. The British empire held most of the world under it at one time, everywhere they had to put up with the English ruling them (and yes the English, the rest of Britain were the first colonies) and getting rich of the worlds resources. And when a few people from the empire that made Britain great come to England she wants to complain. Dumb bitch.
    • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +3 -1
      she is a dumb bitch; that is certain..sadly there are many idiots of every race and gender all over the fucking planet
  • friendlygarfield | 3 years ago | +3
    yes one finds stupid people everywhere
  • ArtemNY | 3 years ago | +6 -3
    Oh damn! What a bitch!!! I hate it! I really really hate racism and niggers!!!!
  • deleted | 3 years ago | +3
    Fucking chav....
  • deleted | 3 years ago | +3
    Watch a program called Shameless, it will explain everything about that wonderful ladies indigenous culture.
    • mmmbabiesyum | 3 years ago
      Did you know that the cable network Showtime made their own version of this show?
      • deleted | 3 years ago
        Yes and it's horrific. Now the sex, drugs and violence are always a good thing. But William.H.Macy is no Francis Vernon Gallagher.
        • mmmbabiesyum | 3 years ago | +1
          that's what I was thinking.. it seems like a complete rip off.. just like when the Mighty Boosh was re-written for "american" comedy.. it completely killed the show in my opinion.
  • Davismike39 | 3 years ago | +3 -1
    Is she from Philadelphia?
    • salar | 3 years ago | +1 -2
      no matter what she saying she still wearing a( black)coat!!! nice colour lol
  • JustAHumanBean | 3 years ago | +2
    I thought the guy behind her was gonna slap the shit out of her. Too bad he got talked out of it. I thought we only had that shit here in the US.
    • FeralGuy | 3 years ago | +2
      You guys haven't got a clue
      • jeptha | 3 years ago | +6
        Yes we know, you guys remind us all the time.
  • pigeons99 | 3 years ago | +2
    It will only get worse I fear. There is a large number of people in all sort of `communities` ( Britain is not one functioning society of integrated people) who cannot differentiate between the illegal and legal citizen not articulate their exact grievance onto the the right person or proper channels. I can understand her arrest for saying nigger, I can understand an arrest for disturbing the peace, possibly incitement of racial hatred for the one word, but as long as its not for saying "Go back where you came from" as that is not racist. Does seem to be much fussed kicked up for something that happens all the time.
    • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +2
      pigeons99, you really think it's okay for her to be arrested because she said "nigger"? what the fuck is going on on that goddamn country? not to mention the hypocrisy of rappers saying "nigger" every other word, between "motherfucker" "bitch" and "you know wha ahm sayin"... but really? you think it's okay to arrest someone for saying something hateful? can't you see where that will lead? jayzoos fooken kriyst ahmytee if you want to live in a free society you have to tolerate expression of ideas of which you don't approve; otherwise there will be thought police. free speech includes hate speech, like it or not..otherwise you will end up with a police state
      • pigeons99 | 3 years ago | +2
        Haha, no, as far as I am concerned, she should be free to say it. However, I said I UNDERSTAND. The rest of what she said is not racist, it is just simply something which would make people cringe. The police will arrest her for that, although in reality a fine or warning would be much more efficient. I think you may have misread me, I am feel and understand what the woman is saying. The British people have had practised upon them, a great social experiment without ever being asked. It is not viable that one native dominant culture can have several others from around the world live side by side with it. The integration just wont happen. Dont get me wrong, people may be friendly, they may try each others foods or enjoy each others celebrations, but integration is more than that. I would suggest Enoch Powell probably got it most right and it is just a question of logic.Divisions will exist on religious, race, educational and economic levels with the communities pushing against each other until its too much
        • bigblackjake | 3 years ago | +2
          well, a little understanding goes a long way then... as voltaire once claimed: "i may not agree with what you say but i'll defend your right to say it"
        • deleted | 3 years ago | +1
          Man, talking about hitting the nail on the head! Pigeons, that is the real problem the UK and other countries in Europe are now dealing with.
    • fickle1 | 3 years ago | +1
      usually "go back to slavery" is a good hint.
  • mmmbabiesyum | 3 years ago | +4 -2
    The only thing that kept that cunt from getting her ass beat was her little aryan baby. Ol boy almost knocked her ass out though!!!
    • deleted | 3 years ago | +3 -2
      your just mad because you're a race traitor..you nigger loving whore!
      • RIGHT AND EXACT | 3 years ago | +2
        A fucked up thing to say to this young lady bad4u2cme
      • mmmbabiesyum | 3 years ago | +1
        YOU'RE just jelly because you can't have it :P
        • deleted | 3 years ago | +1
          I could get me a black face, if I wanted one.. but why the fuck would I want one..lol

          [image] oh you so mad ;~P
          • mmmbabiesyum | 3 years ago | +1
            You just wait till I come that way next year.. you're fucked.
  • RIGHT AND EXACT | 3 years ago | +2
    This is a hell of a thread with some excellent points tossed around pro and con. I'll just say this for this lady.....as infuriating as she is...she has clearly unraveled and that's really all it is. It's not even about racism anymore this is now bordering on a mental health issue and my concern is for that innocent child in her lap. GOD bless her...just look at her face...she's come apart at the seams. Something happened to set her off and whatever has been laying dormant in her system rose to the fore.
    • bigblackjake | 3 years ago
      i'm sure she was the same child in her mother's lap 20 years ago
  • TallyHo | 3 years ago | +2
    Stats of the london riots (compiled by the guardian) 29% of rioters here white (92% UK white population) the average rioter had 15 pervious offences, 90% of black males arrested were unemployed but only 2% of those that do work a full week. There is a massive "social underclass" in the UK which contains whites and non whites but lesser advertised stats show who makes up the majority... Even the new government admitted that minority integration had failed!
  • Digglers | 3 years ago | +3 -1
    I support her right to speak her mind. Frustrating. She probably grew up in a British society only to watch it change in just a few decades. Immigrants outcompeting the native Brits for their menial jobs.
    • BorisYeltsin | 3 years ago | +3 -2
      The "native" Brits? By that I suppose you mean the Celts - who were there before the French/Germans/Norse/Dutch and whoever the fuck else landed on that Island decided to settle there? How is she any more "native" than the blacks that are there? They just landed there at different times.
      • CaptainFlyscratch | 3 years ago | +1
        you have no idea of her heritage...she could be the direct descendant of a Celtic queen, for all you know...
        • BorisYeltsin | 3 years ago | +2
          Again - so what? The Romans were in Britain 2000 years ago - does that give the Italians more right to live in the UK than a family whose ancestors arrived "only" 1000 years ago? Of course not. From your line of thinking you should clear off and give your land to some Abbos - they were there before you after all.
  • deleted | 3 years ago | +2
    5 million people out of work (Thanks to the Finance crisis) and polish and eastern Europeans undercutting and taking jobs and a useless selfish government... wouldn´t you be pissed?
    • TallyHo | 3 years ago
      I know this is happening (my father was a plumber) but I can't fault the polish for how hard they work in comparison to many other imigrants who come just for the benefits and sit on their arse or are handed jobs.. I have worked with many polish men even before we opened the floodgates and I have always respected them! Half the airfields round here had squadrons of poles and they faught for OUR democracy.. It's just a shame the USSR raped them so much!
      • deleted | 3 years ago | +1
        At least they have a work ethic and aren't lazy wastes of space like some of the native Alaskans. They get their monthly stipend, piss it away at the casinos, then bitch and moan when they can't get food stamps
  • Gavz | 3 years ago | +2
    Firstly, I'm glad I live on a island in the middle of fucking nowhere. We can control our illegal immigrant problems a lot better. Not perfect, but we can you coming over the horizon. We will fuck you up. IMO, the U.K. has to tighten their border, as we have, as the US has. If not, your Island country will be fucked and the riots you had will look like a picnic. You gotta act, you have no choice. Sadly, this chav cunt is right.
  • deleted | 3 years ago | +2
    racism sucks
  • deleted | 3 years ago | +3 -1
    It doesn't matter what ethnic back ground u hail from racism stinks. I'm white n I'm English. But what that woman did on that tram she deserves to get a fuckin slap.
  • deleted | 3 years ago | +2
    Racism fuckin stinks. But the only race who have got BIG chips on their shoulders are the Niggers. I agree with her. Fuck off out of our country.
  • fickle1 | 3 years ago | +2
    fuck em shes speaking her mind to randoms on a train, she's HARD! its only talking shit if it aint true
    • fickle1 | 3 years ago | +1
      all jokes aside
      • fickle1 | 3 years ago | +1
        she should go to south africa with a mouth like that!
        • deleted | 3 years ago | +1
          Heh South Africa is as racist as Limbaugh, that would make great radio time
In addition to plain text you can also add links to:
- images
- video pages
- anything else
Simply add a link just like this: http://i.imgur.com/fhfnG.gif and we will do the rest. We will transform all links into clickable links and if the link points to an image or a youtube video page we will open that image / video in a clean pop.

Fail

Details
Images and videos of failure as well as winning moments
Do not post
  • Plain violent materials (like accidents), use the violent category instead