HeEnalu

Ron Paul

The only candidate that makes sense, on 99% of topics and is not a hater.
by HeEnalu 1 year ago (Mon, Jan 02, 2012) in News (SFW)
Good | Poor | +46 -3 94%
Favorite (1) | Flag | Share: Embed | Email | Facebook
x

Select size: Custom: Width: px Height: px
138 comments | Sorted by top | 138 new comments added since your last visit to this upload ( marked in pink background ). You must be logged in for this feature to work
  • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +11
    Ron Paul doesn't go the gym. He stays fit by exercising his civil rights. Ron Paul delivers babies without his hands. He simply reads them the Bill of Rights and they crawl out in anticipation of freedom Ron Paul wasn't born, he liberated himself from the womb. Ron Paul's idea of Gun Control is both hands on the weapon. Ron Paul doesn't pee. He liberates urine. The Chicken crossed the road to vote for Ron Paul. Ron Paul doesn't cut taxes. He kills them with his bare hands.
    • [ -5 Comment by Iraqvet was filtered ] Show (21 descendent comments)
    • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1 -6
      You're right..All countries on the brink of basically no government work fine..Paul would turn this place into one giant version of Somalia...Please pull your head from your ass...This guy is talking about changes he WON'T BE ABLE TO MAKE..Not to mention they are FUCKING STUPID!!!
      • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +2
        Lmfao so who are u gona vote for? He might not be able to.do it but he's the only one who's gona actually fucking try
        • LoneGunman | 1 year ago | +1 -1
          That's what they said about Obama 4 years ago. That maybe he wasn't the ideal man for the job, but the best candidate at the time. Ron Paul or whoever, the shithole the country is in is so fucked up NO ONE will be able to pull it off.
          • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +1
            So don't vote. But if I do t vote don't bitch when shits all muffed
        • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1 -3
          Doesn't matter..Why get a president who WILL STILL GET NOTHING DONE?...You are probably the same person who bitches about Obama but if Paul does the same thing it will be ok?...Doesn't make ANY sense...
          • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +3
            No. I bitched about oboma before he was even president. He was obviously full of whit and only elected because he was "black" truth is I've never had faith in any of them because I can't think of one who's record wouldn't make you laugh your ass off fifteen minuets into resurching them though. Truth is I don't know that ron Paul can save this contry but out of the people running this year he's the ONLY one who can prove he gives a shit about the constitution. He is republican conservative in the truest since. More so than any other republican canadet, I don't even think they technicly qualify for the term any more. Ron Paul is the only person with a track record of trying to uphold the constitution and trying to protect our rights. The president may not even actually run the contrey but I know atleast ron Paul will try. And if he fucks up k.will hold him more accountable than I would anyone else, because he would just be a big fat fucking lyer. If ron Paul turns out to be another puppet i wouldn't even wana say what my plans would be over the internet, as I'm not on TOR. But how will.we know if we don't give him a chance? I don't see any other runners that would give a damn about aduting the federal reserve. Or who would bring ALL of our troops home. Even the ones still in japan and almost every other contry on earth. I don't see him starting an illegal war with someone lime libia either. But how will we know if we don't try? He's the first president with this.set if ideals and liberty since JFK.... we all know what happend to him
            • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
              Again,I am simply saying he speaks about changing things he doesn't have the power or backers to do..
              • fickle1 | 1 year ago | +2
                http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/CIAtimeline.html if the police stayed out of our drug cabinets to a degree i would be happier and obama or any other politician isnt goin to do that
                • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1 -1
                  Sorry,drugs are a problem..
                  • thedood | 1 year ago | +1
                    yea there is a problem coming over free reign cross the mexican border, but if we do anything about it we'd be racist, so we wouldnt want that....BBBLLLLLAAHHH
          • thugslim | 1 year ago | +2
            If you're a vet did you know they are debating right now to cut the pension funds for cops military and gov workers. Ron paul will not do that. And if you think that who is in control now won't you are completely wrong.
            • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
              Actually,just about every cop is a union employee,not federal therefore the government would have no say..They will cut project spending before retire benefits...Paul would make as many cuts as possible..He hates the military..
              • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +1
                Why do we need to be the police men of the word anyway? Why do we need to spend trillions on war when 1 in every 2 Americans is in poverty, and when their is 4 unemployed people for every 1 job opening? How can we justify the monthly cost of our war machine? Lets protect ourselfs but untilled ragheads start storming the boarder fuckem. On the statue of liberty it says give me your tired your poor and your hungry. Well right now that's us. Lets just do us and quit fucking worrying about the gadafdies of the world
                • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
                  I think those are fine ideas...But I don't believe in a total sell off of the government and putting more people out of work...Don't forget,a deregulated Wall St helped this current economy become shitty..Obama tried to tidy it up...Paul want's it to be a free for all if he gets in office..Where will we be then?
                  • thedood | 1 year ago | +1
                    After taking office Obama's whore Pelosi put together a 1000 page bill full of 800 billion pork while we faced a record deficit- Obama's spending is hitting 14 trillion including billions upon billions of bail out money to WFB and BOA and 100's of other fannie freaks and corporate billionaire campain cunts- Obama had a chance to bail out America or the corporations...He chose the corporations, and the average American wi;ll be busting their humps sooner or later to pay it back- It all boils down to this bail out the average american or the corporations- we know who he chose, and I cant believe anyone would ever vote for this pimp a second term-
                    • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
                      I don't agree with the bail outs,but their failure would have costs us more...Not to mention if we got the equivalent bail out,it would have been like $2,000 per person..When you think about it,thats not really bailing all the Americans out...
              • thugslim | 1 year ago | +1
                So the unions pay their salaries not the taxes? Ron paul dosnt hate the military he wants to stop spending so much. Spending is the problem.
                • fickle1 | 1 year ago | +1
                  exactly the economy makes 14 trill a year he has a budget to cut spending by a trill, probbly by taking soldiers out of countries that we've been in since ww2 and have standing armies now!
                  • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
                    Bringing home soldiers from Korea would be a death sentence to those people...And yes,bringing home everyone would mean lowering the amount of people in the military..You can't just send 20,000 people to a base and expect it to be all good when it's already at capacity for housing and such..Not to mention troops abroad are like a quick reaction force..
                • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
                  Local people pay local cops...The president has no say in lowering a cop's wages...DEA,FBI,CIA etc etc are the exception to the rule..
          • phatigue | 11 months ago | +1
            man what do you mean does the same thing?! he doesnt have the bankers and mainstream media on his team like every other candidate and obama.. hes on our side, you think obama gives a shit about iraq vets?! he doesnt care about you he doesnt give a shit about you.. only cares about his team/1% cause hes a fucking pawn.
            • Iraqvet | 11 months ago | +2
              He is a psycho..He is fucking useless...He pulled in the dumb and naive extremists like Osama did...I forgot the "food stamp" president only cares about the 1%...You guys are so full of shit...
  • bigblackjake | 1 year ago | +7
    my fellow americans....... you must realize by now that it does not matter whom you put into the oval office; if you work for a living, you're gonna take it up the tail pipe. that will not change until we have some radical election reform. when i hear a candidate talk SERIOUSLY about that topic and outline at least one plank of that platform, i'll be able to go to the polls and NOT hold my nose while i vote against the other asshole i suspect some of the negging cunts around here will shoot the messenger. okay
  • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +6
    [image]
  • deleted | 1 year ago | +4
    So far Ron Paul seems like the best candidate, IF he can keep some of his promises.
    • thugslim | 1 year ago | +3
      Mysty that is the best things you have ever said
    • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +1 -2
      He's the ONLY one who can actually say he's never shifted in all his years. But then again oboma promised change, he just changed the promise though. "Ill end the war in my first year!!! Hahahah helllzzznaaaw ill drag that shit out FOUR MORE YEARS, and then ill sign the indefinite detention act and bring the battle ground to America!"I woopeee!
  • TheJoekenorer | 1 year ago | +4
    I have to say I'm willing to gamble just to see something different. Our current course is on an imminent path of destruction, and none of the others offer a different course besides him.
  • friendlygarfield | 1 year ago | +4 -1
    has a non US citizen (do not know enough about this bloke) all politicians lie straight faced just before elections if this is been honest or not - i do not know = but he is a politician
    • BeCool2 | 1 year ago | +11 -1
      If you look at his speeches and voting record, he has preaching the same things his is today, for the last 20 years. He's correctly predicting a lot of the economic (and social) issues we've been entrapped in by our governments.
      • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +5
        and he is the ONLY one who can actually say he's never flipp floppd on his issue's or giving in to lobbiest
      • BeCool2 | 1 year ago | +1
        same things he is today **
  • thugslim | 1 year ago | +4 -1
    Finally. A candidate that makes sense and is not owned by a mega corporation
  • oderus | 1 year ago | +4 -1
    Go Ron Paul legalize it! 420 all day
  • jajaallen | 1 year ago | +3
    Im DVS1 and I approve this post...
  • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +2
    [video]
    • deleted | 1 year ago | +1
      His son is a thorough racist, apple do not fall to far from the tree....
  • deleted | 1 year ago | +3 -1
    lower gas so i can drive my 4x4 more and i will vote for him
    • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +3
      [video]
      • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +1
        No, just cuz he takes over dosnt mean they'll go up. Listen to his opinion on that very topic
        • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +2
          That's a fucking lie...The oil production in Iraq is up more because of less violence and control of the fields..Not to mention the technology other countries helped Iraq with to update their refineries..Also,where is the proof we are taking any oil from Iraq..Again,this turd is just playing into what he knows people want to hear..This guy is a jackass who gets the votes from simpletons...
          • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +1
            Lmao Havana wow... I don't even know how to reply to that. That's a comment from someone who obviously has no interest in global economics or a care to observe them. At this point I don't even know what we could base an argument on. If u had any clue of how the world market really works you would laugh your ass off at thatbig statement. Ok how about this, come back when you can actually debunk what he said :p
            • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
              Well gurgles,I have been to Iraq..23 months total..We are not taking any oil from them and their production is UP..I could care less about his GLOBAL plans..I dislike his AMERICAN PLANS..If you know anything about economics,you would know that once we used the gold standard for trade,it would fucking skyrocket the value of gold..Once again,the prices would remain high,or even get higher...Please don't act like you're not speaking out of a blind ignorance when you make comments like that..Gold being traded for oil will increase it's value..That is a fact...
              • fickle1 | 1 year ago | +1
                and there are plenty of people and events that showed the goverment jus ask for more money when they need it and screw up the market
          • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +1
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=K0ZB7E_4GYw ague with any of the points. I'd really like to hear it. If u don't vote u can't bitch when they destroy the contrey. U think Paul is bad? Imagine what those other assholes are gona try to do.
          • fickle1 | 1 year ago | +1
            we are taking oil from iraq we have the technology to take all of it right from under their noses!
            • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
              Prove it...
              • fickle1 | 1 year ago | +1
                all the sunnis were cheering when we left, saddam and the sunnis go way back, they probably have ties with the industrial complex and oil since they are most likely the religion observed in the cities, we have europeans and americans building high tech stuff there since occupying, WE are taking THEIR Oil!
                • fickle1 | 1 year ago | +1
                  as well as improving irans economy, afgan is different tho i know for a fact they are selling lithium to the chinese
                • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
                  Again,prove we are taking their oil...Were you there when we left?.."Sunni" is not a religion...The Kurds who don't get along with them also have some really good oil fields..That doesn't meany anything though...
    • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1 -1
      He would deregulate trade,industry and Wall ST...Gas would probably go to $10 a gallon..
    • deleted | 1 year ago | +2 -3
      I'd like to drive your 4x4 up your ass so I dont have to smell your gas.
  • TheJoekenorer | 1 year ago | +2
    Iraqvet: Who are you going to vote for and why? You speak adamantly against Paul, which is understandable, but you offer no alternative.
    • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1 -4
      I am probably gonna vote for Obama..While Paul wants to put thousands out of the military and take jobs,Obama is trying to do the opposite and keep jobs without giving away America to Wall St anymore than it already is..How can Paul say he's going to get rid of the IRS?..Who/what fill that void?
      • captaink | 1 year ago | +4
        well... a sales tax of 10% across the board on everything, state getting 5% and nation getting 5%. reinstate the tariff on imported goods and tax the fuck out of American companies that moved their companies out of country to avoid taxes to begin with, put our farmers, steel factories and mills back to work and actually have exports again... that's a start!
        • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
          You can't count on sales taxes alone..That depends on how much people spend..He wants to cut the corporate taxes and capital gains taxes..He won;t tax overseas production any more than anyone else won't...It would be good though..Sadly people believe giving more money to the rich will create jobs,and it would if they set guidlines that benefited only companies who hired and kept workers for atleast the entire year and could be verified..I am sure many would try and get around that though..
        • Souder | 1 year ago | +1
          Hold on k...the purpose of a business is to generate revenue, the goal of the business is to maximize profits from that revenue. It is part of what makes America great. The continued increase in the value of the stock of a company provides for retirement incomes. Companies moved production offshore to decrease their costs to manufacture their products thereby increasing profits. Don't the CEOs HAVE to do that? Aren't they suppose to want their company to be successful and increase in value? Why punish them for being successful by "tax the fuck" out of them?
          • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +1
            So lets give all our jobs to the japanise? For every one job opining their our 4 un employed Americans. That dog don't hunt baby.Fuck their tax loop holes.
            • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
              Now see,we agree...But Paul doesn't...He will give them more IE, 15% corporate taxes and no capital gains taxes..
          • captaink | 1 year ago | +1
            companies were given tax breaks to move their companies to other countries, they pay cheap labor and then pay no tariff to bring their products back into America, I'd say they need to be taxed the fuck out of. But a better idea is... give them tax incentives to move their companies back to America and put Americans back to work, quit all the outsourcing of American jobs and services. Before America will ever be as strong as she once was she has to stop importing and start exporting again, and I'm talking product not jobs!
            • Souder | 1 year ago | +1
              Not at all...those companies took advantage of existing tax law that allows them to defer payment of taxes on income earned abroad until the company actually receives the money here in the states. And, as I understand it, they can continue to defer receipt of that money indefinitely. And you don't have to pay taxes on money until you actually receive it. The only way they could receive a "tax break" on that income is if the current administration allows them to receive the money at a lower tax rate. Also, did you just recommend more tax break incentives for companies to keep production in the states. While at the same time recommend we "tax the fuck" out of them. Shouldn't we be closing the "loopholes" in the tax code, not creating more.
            • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
              I agree captaink...We need jobs here..Souder, he said tax the fuck out of overseas companies,not ones in the U.S. but they need taxed too...
        • DAM1OAK | 1 year ago | +1
          Now you're talkin'!
  • Imhotep | 1 year ago | +2
    No other candidate can take on Ron Paul, when it comes to common sense. Vote for Ron Paul and vote for a Senator and Congressman or Congresswoman who believes in his message.
    • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
      What is so common sense about his plans?..
      • GurglesTheKlown | 1 year ago | +2
        Umm. Every single word that comes out of his mouth
        • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
          How can you not see his plan will fuck America up?...When something is dumb,I believe it *lacks sense*....
          • BeCool2 | 1 year ago | +1
            And I believe you *lack sense* by thinking that a vote for the same-old-same-old bullshit is actually going to be better. The United States is in a shithole right now, and they're already covering us with dirt already. It's that same-old shitty politics and policy that got us here. How the fuck do you think it will get better?
            • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
              Well your republican friends put us here by being all about corporate America...The problem with Paul is he want's to get rid of EVERYTHING...Maybe you don't work or something,but I like knowing OSHA has my back and makes sure rules are followed..Paul will get rid of that..And what's gonna happen when he gets rid of minimum wage..People can't live off $10 an hour,let alone $4...Like I said,he is another jackass here for corporate America..He is a republican..
              • BeCool2 | 1 year ago | +1
                I love how you put "your republican friends".

                Anyhow,

                - OSHA is ridiculous. Do you really think if OSHA were to be reduced or eliminated, employers would simply "get rid of" any type of safety precautions? No. Because employees aren't necessarily stupid. Getting rid of OSHA doesn't mean the standards for work practices simply go away.

                - Having a minimum wage is also retarded. Do you really think the $18-35/hr jobs that most middle class rely on would ALL go down to $3/hr? No, they won't. Plus, Is anyone making $7.25 going to be able to support themselves as it is? No way. $290 before taxes doesn't buy shit. You could barely afford to pay for one of those low-budget extended stay motels. If you're making $7.25 an hour, you are not supporting yourself. Most likely you're a kid living in your parents house, in school with student loans, or you're already dependent on a spouse or significant other.
                • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
                  Wow bro,obviously you have never worked in a hazardous work environment...Especially ones including machines ,chemicals,and heavey equipment..I would like to know just how you came up with $18-$35 an hour lmao?..There are are so many temp jobs being filled right now for $7.50 an hour it's sad...Companies will pay what people WILL WORK FOR...Without a minimum wage set,yes,it doesn't take a scholar to figure out wages would drop..I don't think you have a clue dude..These are two things WORKING PEOPLE NEED...I will accuse Paul fans of alot of things,but being smart is not one of them...
                  • BeCool2 | 1 year ago | +1
                    I have worked plenty in hazardous work enviornments, including with chemicals that would kill me within a few seconds or minutes.

                    You fail to realize that over 50% of states have laws/regulations that FAR exceed OSHA standards. Occupational safety is a STATE issue, not a FEDERAL issue. Getting rid of OSHA simply doesn't mean all the STATE regulations go out the window. Same thing for federal minimum wage. Just because Federal minimum wage is gone, doesn't mean State minimum wage is close behind. The states should be the ones to decide on these state-level issues.

                    It just boggles my mind how someone can really think that a nation like the United States would somehow "revert" back to a time and place that's reminiscent of China or India's industrial workforce. We aren't all going to get paid $4 a day and die in two years from silicosis or lead poisoning.
                    • BeCool2 | 1 year ago | +1
                      The majority, if not all, of these Federal programs that Ron Paul wants to get rid of, all have some type of state counterpart. They are simply redundant.

                      Every state has an OSHA equivalent.
                      Every state has an EPA equivalent.
                      Every state has a minimum wage.
                      Every state has a Dept. of Education
                      Every state probably has an equivalent of every department/program on the books.

                      The Constitution is written to allow the States to decide what laws/regulations are pertinent to their constituents. That's all Ron Paul wants.

                      If you don't like what a certain state is doing, move to the next or VOTE for new Representatives/Governors.
                      • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
                        Wow,you truly have no connection to reality, just like the rest of Paul fans...You can believe every state has an equivalent program..And when you find out they really don't you will see us fail because of Paul's untruthful statements...
                        • BeCool2 | 1 year ago | +1
                          The majority of states have equivalents (I'm not talking the qualitative equivalent. Simply the quantitative equivalent) for the majority of programs/departments. This is simple fact. Do some Googling if you really don't believe it.

                          Aside from that, I find it funny that you still believe the same people that started this mess, and are digging us deeper (on purpose), are going to be the ones to fix it.
                          • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
                            Bush started this mess..The economy collaped before Obama remeber?...It;s funny you say we ae getting in deeper when jobs are becoming more available and Obama had to finish wars that were,once again,started before he became president..
                            • BeCool2 | 1 year ago | +1
                              Well, actually a lot of this shit was in place before Bush, but I do agree Bush was a huge POS.

                              About Obama finish wars... Did you forget that Obama started a "mini-war" (as you called) it in Libya, and is desperately trying to start a war in Iran?

                              Obama job growth? What about the fact that 315,000 people lost their jobs in November 2011?
                              • Iraqvet | 1 year ago | +1
                                No president can "start" a war...It takes more than just one person's decision...And yes,more jobs will be lost under Paul..
In addition to plain text you can also add links to:
- images
- video pages
- anything else
Simply add a link just like this: http://i.imgur.com/fhfnG.gif and we will do the rest. We will transform all links into clickable links and if the link points to an image or a youtube video page we will open that image / video in a clean pop.

News

Details
Worldwide news